Reading time: 13 minutes
TLDR: "Watercooler" and "Frankenstein" Special Issues are very different things. We should really be distinguishing them from each other. It's publishers that profit off of free guest editor work that want us to view all things called "Special Issues" as similar products. They aren't, and we need terms that define a spectrum for what goes into editing a "Special Issue."
Figure: Special Issue (red) and Regular Issue (blue) articles by publisher from The strain on scientific publishing.
So you may have read a preprint recently: "The strain on scientific publishing." I found the topic fascinating; heck, I was lead author. In that preprint, we highlighted two mechanisms of publisher growth that generates strain, one of which was the use of "Special Issues" (emphasis on the air quotes). Some publishers have adopted Special Issues as an outlet for publishing guest-edited articles en masse. Now, our preprint took off across the globe, being covered in English, Spanish, Arabic, and Swahili... just to name a few. Somewhat as a result, we've even been attacked by Frontiers Media for somehow being "anti-special issue," which is the topic of today's post: am I anti-special issue? I don't think so. After all, I just finished editing one.
What is a journal?
|
AuthorMark Archives
December 2024
Categories |